Ratko Mladic sentenced to life in
prison for genocide
NEWS / YUGOSLAVIA
READ MORE
Bosnia war victims on
why Mladic's verdict
means little
Europe Yugoslavia Srebrenica
Genocide Crimes against humanity
SIGN UP
Bosnian Serb wartime general Ratko Mladic
appeared in court the receive the verdict [Peter
Dejong/Reuters]
Former Bosnian Serbian commander
Ratko Mladic has been sentenced to life
in prison for genocide and war crimes
during the Balkans conflicts more than
two decades ago.
The presiding judge of the International
Criminal Tribunal for the former
Yugoslavia (ICTY) on Wednesday found
that the 74-year-old general
"significantly contributed" to genocide
committed at Srebrenica.
Previous judgments of the tribunal in
the Netherlands already ruled that the
massacre of about 8,000 Muslim men
and boys in Srebrenica was genocide.
Judge Alphons Orie ruled that the
perpetrators of the crimes committed
in Srebrenica intended to destroy the
Muslims living there.
'Heinous crimes'
The judge also ruled that Mladic carried
out and personally oversaw a deadly
campaign of sniping and shelling in
Sarajevo.
"The crimes committed rank among the
most heinous known to humankind," he
said.
The former general initially appeared
relaxed as he listened intently to the
verdict but was later removed from the
courtroom after he shouted at the
judges when he was refused an
adjournment.
His lawyer said Mladic needed a break
for treatment of high blood pressure
but the continued reading the verdict
after Mladic removal from court.
1930 1940 1950 196
Birth and personal li
RATKO
MLADIC –
ROAD TO
JUDGMENT
The International
Criminal Tribunal for
the former Yugoslavia
(ICTY) is due to pass
its final verdict
against former
Bosnian Serb
commander Ratko
Mladic, known as the
"Butcher of Bosnia" ,
for heading one of
the worst massacres
in recent history .
Timeline JS
Wednesday's verdict was long awaited
by tens of thousands of victims across
former Yugoslavia, and dozens gathered
early outside the courtroom, many
clutching photos of loved ones who
died or are among the 7,000 still
missing.
The court said, however, it was "not
convinced" of genocidal intent in six
other municipalities, in line with
previous judgments.
"We're sad and disappointed because
Mladic wasn't declared responsible for
the genocide in Prijedor and in the
other five municipalities that were
listed," Sejida Karabasic, from Prijedor,
said.
"3,176 people [killed] in Prijedor isn't
enough in order to prove that there was
a mass killing. So, more than 10,000 of
us should have been killed in order to
prove that genocide happened there,”
Karabasic said.
"There were mass rapes, killings,
concentration camps. They found the
largest mass graves in the Prijedor
region, none of that was enough for the
verdict to include genocide," she added.
Munir Habibovic, a Srebrenica resident,
said he was satisfied with the
punishment. We weren't expecting
anything less," he said, while agreeing
that Mladic should have been found
guilty of genocide in the six additional
municipalities.
Speaking on
behalf of the
association for
Parents of
Children Killed
in Besieged
Sarajevo, Fikret
Grabovica told Al Jazeera, that "no such
punishment exists for Mladic to get
what he deserves".
"But we can be a partly satisfied with
this verdict. It's very important that he
received a life sentence… what I'm
particularly glad about is that the
indictment confirmed the terrorising
and sniping of the civil population of
Sarajevo, in which 1,600 children were
killed," Grabovica said.
The former general, dubbed the
"Butcher of Bosnia", was accused of 11
counts - including genocide, war crimes
and crimes against humanity committed
by his forces during the war in Bosnia
from 1992 and 1995.
Many Bosnian Serbs, however, view
Mladic as a national hero who helped
Serbia through the war that broke up
former Yugoslavia.
Serbian daily newspapers on
Wednesday featured photos of Mladic
on the front page with captions reading
"I'm innocent; they can't take my soul"
and "I'm not guilty."
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments