What a US embassy in Jerusalem
means to Palestinians
NEWS / ISRAEL
Israel to expand illegal
settlement in East
Jerusalem
Jerusalem's Old City: Concern over Jewish
expansion
Jerusalem Israel United States
Battle for Jerusalem Politics
SIGN UP
Trump has previously vowed to move the
embassy to Jerusalem [File: Reuters]
New comments by US officials
reiterating a pledge by President
Donald Trump to move the country's
embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to
Jerusalem reflect the futility of peace
negotiations, Palestinians say.
US Vice President Mike Pence said on
Tuesday that Trump is "actively"
exploring "when and how" to relocate
the embassy.
He made the remarks while attending a
United Nations event marking the 70th
anniversary of a vote for the partition
of Palestine , which aided Israel in
establishing a Jewish state.
During his election campaign last year,
Trump repeatedly promised to move
the embassy and recognise Jerusalem as
the Israeli capital.
In June, however, like his predecessors,
Trump signed a six-month waiver to
delay the relocation, which would have
complicated US efforts to resume the
long-stalled Israeli-Palestinian peace
talks.
The White House said at the time that
the question is "not if that move
happens, but only when".
The waiver expires on December 1, and
the Trump administration has not yet
announced whether it plans to renew it
for an additional six months.
The controversial pledge, if
implemented, would make the US the
first country to have its embassy in
Jerusalem - currently, all such
diplomatic missions are located in Tel
Aviv.
It would also overturn decades of
international consensus on Jerusalem, a
highly-contested city, half of which was
occupied and annexed by Israel
following the 1967 War.
"If the relocation happens, it would be
the first of its kind and would reaffirm
to Israel that Jerusalem is 'one and
unified'," Zakaria Odeh, director of the
Civic Coalition for Palestinian Rights in
Jerusalem, told Al Jazeera.
"It is a very dangerous step," he added.
"It would nullify any plans for future
negotiations [on the conflict]."
Israel claims all of Jerusalem as its
"united" capital, and its annexation of
East Jerusalem effectively put the entire
city under de-facto Israeli control. The
Palestinians, however, see East
Jerusalem as the capital of their future
state.
The international community, including
the US, does not recognise Israel's
jurisdiction and ownership of the city.
Palestinians say that moving the
embassy would prejudge one of the
most sensitive issues in the conflict -
the status of Jerusalem - and undermine
the US' status as an honest mediator.
Earlier this year,
Palestinian
President
Mahmoud Abbas
had warned
against the
embassy's move,
in an official
letter addressed
to Trump.
It would have a "disastrous impact on
the peace process, on the two-state
solution and on the stability and
security of the entire region", the letter
read.
Under the proposed 1947 UN Partition
Plan, the city was meant to be
internationally administered, due to its
importance to the three Abrahamic
religions. But, in 1948, Zionist
forces seized the western half of the
city and declared the area as part of
what became Israel.
'Blackmail campaign'
Khalil Shaheen, a Ramallah-based
analyst, described Pence's remarks as
part of a "blackmail campaign", arguing
that the US is using the embassy as a
tool to pressure the Palestinians.
"If the US relocates the embassy to
Jerusalem, it will determine the city's
fate by recognising it as the capital of
the occupying state, before even
embarking on the peace negotiations
it's trying to achieve,"
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments