Manchester Arena attack 'could have been
stopped'
The Manchester Arena bomber had been a
"subject of interest" and opportunities to stop him
were missed, a review says.
Its author, David Anderson QC, said it was
conceivable Salman Abedi's attack, which killed 22
people, could have been avoided had "cards fallen
differently".
But he said it was "unknowable" whether reopening
investigations into Abedi would have thwarted his
plans, adding: "MI5 assesses that it would not."
Greater Manchester Police said its officers would
"never stop learning".
After the Manchester bombing and three terror
attacks in London this year, counter-terror police
and MI5 conducted internal reviews. Mr Anderson
carried out an independent assessments of their
findings.
The reviews, which remain largely secret, are
summarised in Mr Anderson's report, and show:
Abedi had been a "Subject of Interest" for MI5 -
meaning someone they were investigating -
between January and July 2014, and then again
in October 2015
On two occasions in the months before Abedi
attacked, MI5 received intelligence, but its
significance was not fully appreciated at the
time and, in hindsight, was "highly relevant" to
the planned attack
Abedi was identified by MI5 as one of "a few
dozen" people who needed further
consideration. The meeting to do that was due
to take place on 31 May, nine days after the
attack
There was no security service port alert against
Abedi, so he was not questioned at the border
when he returned to the UK from Libya four
days before the attack
The reviews also showed the two other attackers
who had been on MI5's radar were Khuram Butt, the
leader of the London Bridge and Borough Market
attack, and Khalid Masood who targeted
Westminster Bridge in March.
Butt had been identified by MI5 and the police as
someone who wanted to attack the UK two years
earlier.
He was still a "live subject of interest" who was
under investigation at the time of the attack, though
more for his intention to travel to Syria and for
radicalising others.
He was also the main target of "Operation
Hawthorn" - but this was suspended twice because
of a lack of resources after the Bataclan attack in
Paris and the Westminster Bridge attack.
Operation Hawthorn had resumed and was running
on the day Butt attacked.
Mr Anderson, a former independent reviewer of
terror legislation, said: "Despite elevated threat
levels, the fundamentals are sound and the great
majority of attacks continue to be thwarted.
"But the shock of these incidents has prompted
intensive reflection and a commitment to significant
change.
"In particular, MI5 and the police have identified the
need to use data more effectively, to share
knowledge more widely, to improve their own
collaboration and to assess and investigate terrorist
threats on a uniform basis, whatever the ideology
that inspires them."
Could MI5 really have stopped the attacks?
By Dominic Casciani, BBC home affairs
correspondent
It says not - but Mr Anderson believes there were
opportunities. Given the scale of terrorism-related
activity since 2013 - when the Syria crisis gave a
boost to recruitment in the UK - there is no doubt
that the security service has been juggling a huge
numbers of cases.
The real question is whether the manpower is
matched with the right data tools and relationships
with other bodies to stop more of the threats before
it is too late.
Data analysis will play an increasingly important
role in trying to spot individuals who may pose a
threat after years of being quiet.
Perhaps the most important change to come is that
MI5 may be told to share some of what it knows
with other agencies - such as local councils - in the
hope that people on the ground can provide the
missing piece of information they need to disrupt a
threat.
This raises huge cultural challenges for an
organisation that necessarily operates below the
radar.
Read more of Dominic's analysis
Some relatives of victims have given their views on
the report.
Steve Goodman, whose step-granddaughter 15-year-
old Olivia Campbell-Hardy was killed in the blast,
said: "The police were doing their jobs as best they
could.
"Unfortunately information is not always reliable."
Dan Hett lost his brother Martyn, 29, in the
explosion.
In a series of tweets said he could not "fathom how
complicated modern antiterrorism intelligence is".
He added that the positive aspects of the
emergency services' response should also be
highlighted.
Terror attacks this year
A man in a hired car drove into pedestrians
on Westminster Bridge then stabbed a police
officer outside Parliament on 22 March
A suicide bomber targeted young people at
the end of a concert by US singer Ariana
Grande at Manchester Arena on 22 May
A van hit pedestrians on London Bridge before
three men got out and stabbed people in
nearby Borough Market on 3 June
A group of Muslim worshippers were hit when
a van mounted the pavement and drove into
them in Finsbury Park, in north London, on 19
June
The home secretary said nine terror attacks had
been prevented in the UK since the Westminster
attack in March.
In a statement to the Commons, Ms Rudd said MI5
and the police had made 126 recommendations.
These included issues such as data sharing and
analysis and how so-called "closed subjects"
should be managed, as well as a new approach to
managing domestic extremism, particularly of right-
wing groups.
"We will shortly be announcing the budgets for
policing for 2017-18, and I am clear that we must
ensure counter terrorism policing has the resources
needed to deal with the threats that we face," she
told MPs.
Mr Anderson's predecessor Lord Carlile said the
126 recommendations should be "put into effect as
soon as possible".
The Met Police said the number of dangerous,
radicalised individuals was "a major issue".
Commissioner Cressida Dick said her force needed
"to make rapid progress in implementing the
recommendations, many of which require new
technology, better infrastructures and resources".
Following the publication of the report, the prime
minister's spokesman said the government would
pay £9.8m in special funding to Greater Manchester
Police, in relation to its response to the Manchester
Arena bombing.
'Spinning plates'
The Mayor of Greater Manchester Andy Burnham
said the report would be difficult reading for the
people of his city.
"It is clear that things could, and perhaps should,
have been done differently and that wrong
judgements have been made," he said.
But, he said, it should reassure the public to know
MI5 were closing in on Abedi.
It would be much more worrying if nothing had
been known about the attack, he added.
Chris Phillips, a former head of the National Counter
Terrorism Security Office, said: "When you look
back, within terrorism, you will always find some
way that we could have stopped something.
"I always equate it to spinning plates. They've got
hundreds and thousands of plates spinning at any
given time.
"Someone has to make some risk-assessed
decisions as to who is at the top of the pile to be
watched."
The current threat level for terrorism in the UK is
severe, meaning an attack is highly likely,
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments