Matthew Petersen: Quiz-flunking Trump judge nominee withdraws
US President Donald Trump's latest judiciary nominee has withdrawn his name after failing to answer basic legal questions at his Senate confirmation hearing.
Video of Matthew Petersen's embarrassing encounter went viral.
"It has become clear to me over the last few days that my nomination has become a distraction," Mr Petersen wrote in a letter.
Mr Petersen was nominated as a federal judge in the District of Columbia.
Mr Trump had accepted his offer to withdraw, the White House said.
Mr Peterson, a Republican member of the Federal Election Commission, is the latest of Mr Trump's conservative judicial nominations to fail.
At the hearing, Mr Peterson stumbled over questions asked by Republican Senator John Kennedy.
The exchange
Senator Kennedy starts by asking Mr Petersen and the four other nominees who appeared with him: "Have any of you not tried a case to verdict in a courtroom?"
Only Mr Petersen raises his hand.
Senator Kennedy: Have you tried a jury trial?
Matthew Petersen: I have not.
Senator Kennedy: Civil?
Matthew Petersen: No.
Senator Kennedy: Criminal?
Matthew Petersen: No.
Senator Kennedy: Bench?
Matthew Petersen: No.
Senator Kennedy: State or federal court?
Matthew Petersen: I have not.
Senator Kennedy: Have you ever taken a deposition by yourself?
Matthew Petersen: Uh, I believe no.
Senator Kennedy: Just for the record, do you know what a motion in limine is?
Matthew Petersen: I would probably not be able to give you a good definition right here at the table.
The Louisiana Senator and former law professor, who still fully supports Mr Trump, openly criticised his nominee in a later TV interview.
"Just because you've seen My Cousin Vinny doesn't qualify you to be a federal judge," Mr Kennedy told local station WWL-TV , referring to the 1992 comedy film about a novice lawyer.
Mr Kennedy told the station that Mr Trump called him after learning of the exchange and agreed that Mr Peterson was too inexperienced.
Mr Peterson, who became the third of Mr Trump's judicial picks to flounder in just a week, said: "I had hoped that my nearly two decades of public service might carry more weight than my two worst minutes on television."
Despite recent setbacks, Mr Trump has made progress filling other judicial vacancies with conservative judges and notably restored the Supreme Court's conservative majority with the appointment of Justice Neil Gorsuch.
Related Topics
Donald Trump United States
Share this story About sharing
Top Stories
US 'Cold War mentality' angers China
After being labelled a rival power, China says the US should "abandon outdated notions".
19 December 2017
Derailed US train went 80mph into bend
19 December 2017
US ready to 'denuclearise' N Korea
19 December 2017
Features
Italian king's reburial reopens old wounds
The phone app that could save your life
Could deadly diseases be 'uninvented'?
Does profiling make sense - or is it unfair?
The lost fishermen of India's Cyclone Ockhi
North Korea's surprising number of friends
Australia's escalating gambling addiction
Muslim woman seeks seat in Catalonia
Trump’s pragmatic view of troubled world.
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments