North Korea: US in race to address threat,
says HR McMaster
White House national security adviser HR
McMaster says the US is "in a race" to address the
threat from North Korea.
The potential for war is increasing every day but
armed conflict is not the only solution, he told a
defence forum.
His comments came three days after North Korea
carried out its first ballistic missile test in two
months, in defiance of UN resolutions.
The latest missile flew higher than any others
previously tested, before falling into Japanese
waters.
Tensions have heated up in recent months over the
north's continued development of its nuclear and
missile programme, in spite of global
condemnation and international sanctions.
Pyongyang conducted its first nuclear test in
September.
What could tip the balance into full conflict?
North Korean missile pictures and what they
tell us
What damage could North Korea do?
The Pentagon was also reported to be scouting
sites on the west coast of America to deploy extra
defences, amid claims from North Korea that its
latest missile could reach the whole of continental
United States.
President Donald Trump's national security adviser
gave his unscripted comments at a forum in
California on Saturday.
"There are ways to address this problem short of
armed conflict, but it is a race because he's getting
closer and closer, and there's not much time left,"
Mr McMaster said, in reference to North Korean
leader Kim Jong-un.
He singled out China, urging the Beijing government
to enforce a total oil embargo on the north to make
it difficult to fuel missile launches.
"We're asking China to act in China's interest, as
they should, and we believe increasingly that it's in
China's urgent interest to do more."
"You can't shoot a missile without fuel," he added.
North Korea, meanwhile, has accused the US and
neighbouring South Korea of being warmongers
ahead of large-scale joint air exercises between the
two allies that begin on Monday.
"It is an open, all-out provocation against the DPRK
[North Korea], which may lead to a nuclear war any
moment," an editorial in the ruling party's Rodong
newspaper said.
North Korea said the Hwasong-15 missile it fired
on Thursday, which reached an altitude of 4,475km
(2,780 miles) and flew 950km in 53 minutes, could
have been tipped with a "super-large heavy
warhead" capable of striking the US mainland.
However, while analysts agree the missile could
have travelled more than 13,000km on a standard
trajectory and reach the US, they have cast doubts
over whether the missile would have been able
successfully to carry a heavy warhead that distance.
They do not believe North Korea has mastered the
technology to prevent the warhead from breaking up
as it re-enters the Earth's atmosphere.
Reuters news agency reported on Sunday that
research was under way to locate new sites on the
US west coast for the possible installation of
Terminal High Altitude Area Defense (Thaad) anti-
ballistic missiles, similar to those already deployed
in South Korea to protect against potential attacks
from the north.
It quoted two congressmen, who said the Missile
Defense Agency (MDA) was aiming to install extra
defences, although no details on locations or timing
were given.
However, the MDA, which is part of the US defence
department, says it has not yet received instructions
to deploy Thaad systems.
What impact could Thaad have on the Korean
peninsula?
Two Thaad systems have already been deployed to
South Korea and the US Pacific territory of Guam,
which is 3,400km from Pyongyang.
In August, Kim Jong-un announced plans to fire
medium-to-long-range rockets towards Guam,
where US strategic bombers are based alongside
more than 160,000 US citizens.
Thaad systems are able to shoot down short and
medium-range ballistic missiles in the terminal
phase of their flight using hit-to-kill technology
where kinetic energy destroys the incoming
warhead.
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments