UN Security Council to weigh resolution on Jerusalem NEWS / MIDDLE EAST
READ MORE
UN resolutions on occupied East Jerusalem
READ MORE
Trump's Jerusalem move: Key questions answered
Jerusalem Middle East
Politics, The draft resolution calls on all UN member states not to move their diplomatic missions to Jerusalem [File: Richard Drew/AP Photo]
The UN Security Council is expected to vote on Monday on a draft resolution regarding the status of Jerusalem , less than two weeks after US President Donald Trump declared the city Israel's capital.
Trump made the announcement on December 6, saying at the time that the US would be moving its embassy in Israel from Tel Aviv to Jerusalem.
The leaked Egyptian-drafted resolution obtained, however, does not mention the United States by name, saying it "deeply regrets recent decisions regarding the status of Jerusalem".
Mike Hanna, reporting from the UN headquarters in New York, said it was understood that countries such as Egypt and the UK "wanted to try and keep the language as neutral as possible in a - possibly vain - attempt to keep the US from exercising its Security Council veto".
This caused "a degree of anger" to Palestinian delegates who "wanted to single out the US by name", added Hanna.
As it stood by Sunday night, the leaked text was a restatement of the UN's position on Jerusalem as outlined through decades of Security Council and General Assembly's resolutions, our correspondent noted.
It affirms "that any decisions and actions which purport to have altered, the character, status or demographic composition of the Holy City of Jerusalem have no legal effect, are null and void and must be rescinded in compliance with relevant resolutions of the Security Council".
The text also calls on all UN member states not to move their diplomatic missions to Jerusalem.
Unlikely to pass
The resolution, however, is widely expected to face a US veto, which would render it futile.
The Security Council consists of five permanent members: China, France, Russia, the UK and the US, as well as 10 non-permanent members.
A veto from any of the five permanent members would block the resolution from passing.
Hanna said that the there may be efforts by the Palestinians and Turkey to take the issue to the UN General Assembly if the US vetoes the resolution.
"It would appear that that veto is likely to happen with Israel's enthusiastic backing, which describes the resolution as a Palestinian attempt to reinvent history, despite the fact that it is routed on UN resolutions as they stand at present," added Hanna.
Mass rallies
Trump's declaration fueled widespread anger and protests within Palestine and across the world, with the latest and
largest demonstration taking place on Monday in the Indonesian capital Jakarta, where some 80,000 people rallied outside the US embassy in the city.
Since the decision, nine Palestinians have been killed and more than 1,900 people have been injured in protests in the occupied territories.
Due to Jerusalem's importance to the three Abrahamic religions - Islam, Judaism, and Christianity - the city's status has long been the main sticking point in the Israeli-Palestinian conflict.
After occupying the city's eastern part in the 1967 War, Israel annexed the territory. In 1980, it proclaimed it as its "eternal, undivided capital."
Israel's control and sovereignty over the city is not recognised by any country in the world and, as of now, all embassies in Israel are based in Tel Aviv, although some countries have based their consulate offices in Jerusalem.
The Palestinian leadership in the West Bank, however, see East Jerusalem as the capital of a future Palestinian state.
They have warned that any change to the status quo would mean the end of the peace process premised on a two-state solution.
Why are British Muslim marriages unprotected by law? FEATURE / ISLAM MUSLIM MARRIAGE IN THE UK 60 percent Muslim marriages religious-only, unregistered 28 percent do not realise Islamic ceremony not legally recognised 66 percent know union has no legal status 50 percent do not intend to have marriage legalised - Source: Channel 4 survey Aina Khan Aina Khan is a journalist focusing on race, faith and identity. She's reading a masters in religion in politics at SOAS. @ ainajkhan United Kingdom Islam Europe, Maureen, right, was not entitled to financial support after her husband Rashid - the father of her child - passed away [Courtesy: Maureen] London, England - When Maureen wed her husband Rashid in a Muslim ceremony in 1973 in Bradford, she knew that should the relationship fall apart, she would not be entitled to share his assets. Her marriage was sanctified in the eyes of God, but in the eyes of the state it was "unregistered", not legal, and so financial protection...
Comments